Login/Sign Up




forced athletes to represent their countries in competition whether or not
Sports

deporteatleta123
Sep 01, 2011
3 votes
3 debaters


+ Add Argument

3
pro


therabidrabbit
Sep 02, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal
it should be.
why else would athletes represent any other country besides their own?
and if they win it for another country, it actually isn't that other country's.

 
neverblade
Sep 03, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Athletes should represent the country that they are loyal to. There would be no point in competition between different countries if the competitors themselves weren't actually representing them. It would be like be like having a pokemon duel, but not knowing who's pokemon were on who's side.

A more accurate question to be asked would be the definition of an athlete being loyal enough to represent their country.

 
+ Add Argument

0
against


lyagami
Sep 04, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal
The problem with this proposal is how do you define "their country". As far as representing the country that defines an athlete the two most logical choices would be: their current country of citizenship, or the country to which they were born. The further question about this topic is what would be the point of restricting an athletes participation to these countries?

The only legitimate reason that I can see in restricting an athletes participation with another countries athletic organization would be to prevent athletes from using their talents for some sort of monetary gain during Olyimpic events. For example, if any country offered a Quid Pro Quo arrangement to an athlete to participate in its national Olympics team when the athlete as no other reason (national loyalty) to join, then yes the idea of restricting the athletes participation to their country of origin would make sense.

After that example I can't really see what the advantage of such a rule would be. I mean a lot of athletes represent the country of origin for their team (tour de france), or otherwise the competition itself isn't very beholden to pit country against country on the backs of the athletes participating.

In the end the only reason I can think to enforce such a rule would be to stop countries from "buying" recognition in events that pit the best of their athletic talents against other talented individuals representing other countries around the world in an Olympic sponsored event.

 


Use these tags to find similiar debates

athletes Baseball Basketball bears Chicago colts football hockey Indianapolis NCAA nhl olympics rugby Soccer sport Sports Steroids super bowl superbowl vancam world series