Login/Sign Up

Why would Midland, Texas use $50,000 taxpayer's money to pay for a Christian concert?

Jul 18, 2011
3 votes
4 debaters

+ Add Argument

Ignore Separation of Church and State

Jul 19, 2011
0 convinced
Personally, I don't think that any government would intentionally go against the separation of church and state. I just think that they didn't think that anybody would challenge this pricey concert, with the estimated population of Midland being just over 250,000. Also, Midland is the home of George Bush, so who the hell knows what's going on there =P (sorry Republicans, you've had your good Presidents, but Mr. Bush was rather silly!)

Jul 29, 2011
0 convinced
Seperation of church and state can not be found anywhere in the US constitution. Let Midland, Texas do what it wants.

Sep 08, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal to: libertas Show

I am also Christian. And I do agree that the Government can not and should not establish a national religion, but in this case the money is being used to provide entertainment to people. This is no different than a city using money to build a stadium. Secondly, in this case it is supporting a good cause. Whether you are christian or not, the church helps out the poor, hungry, homeless etc. so the money is going back into the community. Third, most of Texas is Christian, and the point of a democracy is to support the majority. Just because a few people aren't christian in this area, doesn't mean that the event can not be supported. Remember the purpose of a Democratic Republic is to do what is in the best interest of the majority of the community.

+ Add Argument

Intentionally violate Separation of Church and State

Aug 01, 2011
0 convinced
Actually, the separation of church and state IS in the constitution, it's the first amendment. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This includes using public money to do the same. Being a devout Christian myself, I do not appreciate any anti-Christian behavior. However, "the separation of church and state" is in the constitution to protect all religions, from persecution...and from government favoritism


Use these tags to find similiar debates

britain death government politics uk 2008 2009 9/11 abortion Afghanistan america Arizona AU bad Baha BBC bias Biden boycott Britain bush canada capitalism Censorship cheney children China Christianity church cia Clinton Cold War commonwealth communism Communist congress conservative conservatives conspiracy Constitution Corruption country crime death debate defeat Democracy democrat Democrats detention discrimination drugs economics economy education election elections Ethics EU Europe Euthanasia evil Fascism feminism Fight France Frankie freedom Freedom of speech freedoms french gay Gaza george bush Georgia global global warming goverment government Great Britain Guantanamo Bay guns Health Health Care Healthcare Hillary hillary clinton History Hitler homosexual human rights illegal illegal immigration immigration india iran Iranian presidential election iraq islam Israel japan Jewish juggernaut justice Karl law laws legal legislation liberal lies marijuana marriage mccain media Medicine mexico middle east military monarchy money moral morals Mugabe Muslim Muslims news North Korea nuclear nukes Obama objective Oil opression Osama pakistan Palestine Palin Panda paradox parliament peace petition philosophy policy politicians Politics polygamy power president Prime Minister prisoners protest Public Affairs punishment queen race racism religion republican Republicans revolution right rights Rove russia Saddam Sarkozy Security sex socialism Society South Korea sovereignty Supreme court tax taxes terror terrorism terrorist terrorists Tibet torture Troop U.S. uk un united nations united states us usa vancam vote Votes voting war washington weapons wmd women world wrong