Login/Sign Up




Is global warming manmade?
Science

tuesdaydebate
Jul 21, 2010
22 votes
18 debaters
7
3


+ Add Argument

17
Yes


mikeyv113
Jul 21, 2010
3 convinced
Rebuttal
Global warming is a bad term. Climate change is the better scientific word to use. Climate change is both man made and a natural process. We know enough from ice cores and fossils that carbon levels have fluctuated all throughout history causing ups and downs in temperature. There are also natural greenhouse gases in our atmosphere (including carbon) that are supposed to be there. The problem is that due to the industrial revolution we have been adding more greenhouse gases to what is supposed to naturally be there.

It's not as bad as some will make it out to be, but increased gases will increase temperatures which will melt the ice caps which will affect the salt content of ocean water which will affect ocean currents which will affect land climates. That's something we need to avoid by not adding more greenhouse gases to those which are supposed to be there,

 
larryt700
Jul 24, 2010
1 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: emperorofone Show

Uh yeah! Let me give you a little advice...

When people throw words in like ir-refutable, consensus, unquestionable..... Then you are being brainwashed and SCAMMED!

Gore used the most basic techniques and he hit the target audience who are the naive idiot extremist environmentalists (you bone heads).

Here is a link that you NEED to look at. As you go down the list of brainwashing methods, you will see that Gore's dumb movie that had ALL constructed and contrived data, yet made you idiots believe it...

http://www.phinnweb.org/neuro/brainwash/

Which applies to the global warming scam? Lemme tell you....

1) HYPNOSIS - Inducing a high state of suggestibility, often thinly disguised as relaxation or meditation.


2) PEER GROUP PRESSURE - Suppressing doubt and resistance to new ideas by exploiting the need to belong.

4) REJECTION OF OLD VALUES - Accelerating acceptance of new lifestyle by constantly denouncing former beliefs and values.

5) CONFUSING DOCTRINE - Encouraging blind acceptance and rejection of logic through complex lectures on an incomprehensible doctrine.

6) METACOMMUNICATION - Implanting subliminal messages by stressing certain key words or phrases in long, confusing lectures.

14) CONFESSION - Encouraging the destruction of individual ego through confession of personal weaknesses and innermost feelings of doubt.

15) FINANCIAL COMMITMENT - Achieving increased dependence on the group by 'burning bridges' to the past, through the donation of assets.

16) FINGER POINTING - Creating a false sense of righteousness by pointing to the shortcomings of the outside world.

18) CONTROLLED APPROVAL - Maintaining vulnerability and confusion by alternately rewarding and punishing similar actions.

21) NO QUESTIONS - Accomplishing automatic acceptance of beliefs by discouraging questions.

22) GUILT - Reinforcing the need for 'salvation' by exaggerating the sins of the former lifestyles.

23) FEAR - Maintaining loyalty and obedience to the group by threatening soul, life or limb for the slightest 'negative' thought, word or deed.

If you don't believe me, then go back to Gore's hockey stick graph and tell me that the seas rose one foot but his graph says ten by now. Then check the polar bear populations and see how they are rising and not falling since the eighties. Then look at the last ten years where it was a cooling trend...

YOU IDIOTS FELL FOR IT. Now about that consensus..... Has anyone ever looked at the list of scientists that they have? Aside from the dead ones and the ones who were dubbed freakin nuts, most AREN'T EVEN SCIENTISTS!!!! They are PR people..... LOOK THEM UP!

So, I am certainly justified, have evidence and can back up my claim that you all are IDIOTS! When someone comes to my door and says he is Santa Claus, I ask for id and contemplate proning him out, yet you folks would invite him in for a spot of tea.

Don't Drink the Kool Aid.... It didn't work for Jim Jones' CULT and it's not going to work for the global warming cult!

 
starxx101
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

Global warming is not man-made in the sense that man 'made' global warming. However, global warming is a result of the things that men do. Global warming is happening and being realized in countries all over the world. Scientists have gathered and interpreted data to support this. Things just don't happen. Something as serious as this shouldn't be made into a scam and it shouldn't be treated as a joke either.

 
mikeyv113
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

Global warming is not a scam, it's simple science. Greenhouse gases trap radiation the Earth gives off. If we add more greenhouse gases, we trap in more radiation which means temperatures go up.

Also, the cap and trade system has reduced SO2 emissions cutting down the amount of acid rain in the northeast that carries over from the midland states. Please don't tell me acid rain is a scam too.

 
ezpzbutton
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

Dude, stop this obvious troll. The gases don't work as you think they work. They ABSORB heat - they don't reflect heat or whatever you think they do. It's not some sort of a layer that heat can't penetrate - "trap" is misleading in describing the process. From this, as long as you aren't stupid yourself, you will understand how accumulation of greenhouses gases cause rise in temperatures on Earth. This week's debate topic is too one sided, imo. There is basically a ton of science behind human activities having caused (or if you don't want to be too conclusive about that), sped up, global warming. Or you could say it was some amazing sort of coincidence that over the last century greenhouse gases have grown in concentration in the atmosphere (due to humans, no debate there) and at the same time it keeps getter hotter and hotter - Err... just no.

 
starxx101
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

Our atmosphere is meant to let SOME radiation in to warm our planet. Some radiation doesn't enter (they are reflected), the some that does is later released into the atmosphere. The problen is, the radiation that is released gets trapped in the atmosphere. EXCESSIVE Greenhouse gases are responsible for this. Haven't you seen the pictures? Glaciers in the polar caps are slowly melting. The glaciers are slowly decreasing in size that the animals (i.e. polar bears, penguins) are shown to have less space (or ice) to stay on. Besides, it is totally unfair to question the credibility of the scientists.

As I've said before, the climate IS changing. It is not just a scam. Who do you think is responsible for the excessive greenhouse gases? Aside from the 'trapped' heat, there is also the case of the hole in our Ozone Layer. Because of the said hole, more heat and UV rays enter our atmosphere. These contribute to the over-all warming of our planet. Do you think the hole is just another part of a scam? There is a hole in the ozone layer because of the CFC gas. CFC is found in hairsprays and other MANMADE products.

 
starxx101
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

We don't need to get rid of ALL the CO2. Who said anything about that? The point is, climate change (Global warmng) is happening! Whatever you say about those gases doesn't erase the fact that humans are the reason for it! As I'v mentioned before, Global warming is the result of the doings of man (i.e. emission of fossil fuel, industrialization, excessive logging, etc.). As many people have observed, the climate is changing. Our planet has been existing perfectly well for the past billion years, that is until men appeared.

"Almost all of the evidence shows we are getting warm. There is no doubt about it," said David C. Bader, deputy director of the Oak Ridge Climate Change Science Institute. -- SEE!

http://www.wate.com/global/story.asp?s=12855794

The world is getting warmer. You know what? This debate is about whether or not global warming is manmade! The arguments you are posting suggests that global warming doesn't exist! The polar caps ARE MELTING!

Some effects of Global Warming include the ff.:
1. Rising sea levels
2. Salt water intrusion
3. Beach erosion
4. Extreme weather
5. Increased rainfall
6. Destabilization of local climates
7. Acidic oceans
8. Drought

How else will you explain these phenomenons? By saying that all of it is just part of a scam?! The planet is being destroyed because of ignorant people like you who doesn't even observe what's happening in our environment.

 
starxx101
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

How about reaading this article from the site of NASA..

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

 
mikeyv113
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

I got an A- in a college environmental science class so I think I know what I'm talking about. Since you don't let me explain the process. If you picked up a science textbook I wouldn't have to do this.

Sun gives off heat in the form of rays which enter our atmosphere. Some of the rays are automatically bounced back into space at the very first layer. The rest enters Earth. Some of the rays automatically bounce off the surface (whether land or water) and leave out atmosphere. Some bounce but due to the layer of greenhouse gases they do not leave our atmosphere and bounce back down which is what I called the "trap". Also, the Earth does produce heat as well and gives off its own radiation which will either leave the atmosphere or be trapped.

Greenhouse gases have always been in the Earth's atmosphere since whenever that was billions of years ago. If we didn't have any all the rays we get from the sun would just bounce right back into space. The gases are meant to trap SOME of the rays so the Earth can stay warm. Think of it as a big giant blanket if you will.

The problem is that we've been adding more gases than what is naturally supposed to be there. Back to the blanket, imagine you had a nice big comfy blanket that was just the right size and kept you at just the right warmth. Then someone starts making the blanket thicker. It starts to get heavy and you get hot under it and you no longer feel comfortable under it.

I know you're a troll and you're just going to post another stupid comment to this but seriously, a five year old could probably understand the blanket concept!

 
larryt700
Jul 23, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
All of your CULT spewing does not change the fact that IT IS A SCAM!!! IT IS STILL A SCAM, IT WAS ALWAYS A SCAM and WILL ALWAYS BE A SCAM!!!!!

PERIOD!!!! So, quit throwing your petty textbook jargon at me. When I went to college, I got 4.0's not A's you grade school punks!

 
ryvius
Jul 23, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/james_balog_time_lapse_proof_of_extreme_ice_loss.html

 
gpusucker
Jul 23, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
No global warming is real.
Lets face it co2 levels have risen because we burn fuel, in the past co2 levels were higher because the earth was "brand new" and plants that absorbed co2 didn't exsist yet. once palnts started to sprout, the co2 levels have declined til recent human activity.
It's real and i won't deny that alot of companys, governments do want to make more money and sometimes do alot more damage than good, these people are ruining the good will of real people who are concerned abou the environment.
besides its not a bad idea to becareful, we only have one planet we can call home, so why not clean up a little?
unless you're all lazy and thinks its easier to take no action...

 
starxx101
Jul 24, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

What planet did you come from??!! It doesn't take a scientist to know that there is something off about our environment. If you THINK that article is part of a scam, what makes you think the articles you posted are not part of a scam either??!! Not everything the media says is true. Sometimes the media makes things seem worse than what it really is.

But there is no sense arguing with a SHIT-FACE like you. You think you're so smart you don't even understand that a debate is a FORMAL arguement. Not an excuse to insult somebody. Believe what you want to believe and I'll believe what I KNOW is true. I'm not conceding, I just don't want to STOOP to your level.

 
lilaboty
Jul 24, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
it is a grim reality that global warming is caused by human.There are many elements which lead to global warming like emission of toxic gases from vehicles,industries.These elements get trapped into the atmosphere n cause devastating effects into the earth.The temperature of our planet is rising gradually,polar ice cap is melting n sea level is resing for this global warming.
So i think we should take strict measures to control it by reducing the usage of this toxic materials.

 
starxx101
Jul 27, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

One can hardly make a judgement without knowing a person. Who are you to judge my character? Who are you to judge the credibility of the scientists who claim that global warming exists and is the result of the wrongdoings of men? I, for one, am well-educated and I have knowledge of what we are talking about. UNLIKE YOU! You are in the wrong debate room, posting arguments about the global warming being a part of a scam when the 2 sides clearly state that the other side (your side) is about global warming NOT being manmade. No experience about what?!

You are a jerk, a know-it-all and most of all a royal pain in the a**!

 
lenodarkshine
Jul 28, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Sorry, I only joined this arguement as I misread the title : "Is Global Warming Marmalade?". Yes, absolutely.

 
mikeyv113
Jul 29, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

First, thank you. Secondly, learn to spell. Thirdly, get your facts straight cause I did "figer" out this one. CO2 levels haven't been at the level today in over 15 million years and the temperature was five to ten degrees hotter than now. Give me an accurate source for those statistics you provided.

 
thomasonmb1
Aug 04, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
What is this an irrational row between a liberal and conservative. I'm somewhat of a global warming sceptic. It is true there is a lot of sh*t on both sides. But especially on the side which tries to deny global warming at all. Let's ask ourselves a question. Who has got most too lose from manmade global warming. The oil companies paying scientists to perpetuate rumours of global warmings so called flaws, or climatologists who place there whole career on line advocating what is a highly unpopular theory with government and companies, because its repercussions or so great, and would mean both sectors having to spend billions of pounds. It's much easier for people too believe it's not real.

The guy on the other side is right to point people in the direction of other alternative theories or so called rebuttals of global warmings 'tax scam myth'. However it fails to miss to important points. Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased because of the way we humans make our energy. I consider this to be very simple cause and effect. Also global warming has taken place many times in the past directly correalted to carbon dioxide levels. Also the guy on the other side seems to misunderstand why global warming causes the planet too cool down. It does seem rather parodoxical. This to my understanding is simple. CO2 rises, the more there is the more photons will be blocked from it's passage to the earth, causing the earth to freeze over as the cycle of photosynthesis takes place.

Larryt700 may have a passionate of rigourous reply to my comment. He is free to send it. But if he includes worlds like stupid, idiot and moron and doesn't try to tone down to a rational, thought-out discussion, i won't bother reading it, and render him a paronoid republican

 
theudas
Oct 11, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Climate change in the academic would is a fact. The degree of the negative outcomes are still contested now and then but we know there will be some. Its backed by facts. And even if it wasn’t “going green” is better for the world we live in and seeing that its more sustainable and helps make healthier people why the hell would you oppose it

 
sandra1314sundae
Feb 19, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal
it's manmade.

 
daisycloud
Dec 04, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

Have you ever looked at a graph of co2 emissions over the past million years? It goes up, down, up, down, WAY, WAY UP. It's really quite obvious. Why would your so called "environmental nazis" make up such a "scam"? What benefit would they get? And how come almost all major scientists believe it is manmade?

 
daisycloud
Dec 04, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

You are an idiot. Enough said.

 
theudas
Dec 05, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

Cap and trade is an ineffective way to address climate and environmental concerns. It is essentially a market-based tool to allow for continued development and exploitation of the natural environment.

However, the science backs global warming/climate change as reality.


It is like suggesting that the world is flat, and that selling globes is just a scam to make money.

 
rexy93
Dec 08, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Personally I believe climate change is likely to be man-made, however both proponents and opponents of climate change ignore the root cause, which is simply that there are too many human beings for the World to support-our population has just exceeded 7 billion, up from around 2 billion just 100 years ago.

Few people realise that there are roughly 5 billion people alive today (you and me are possibly two of them), that would not be alive, if not for fossil fuels, chiefly oil, as these are used to artificially boost crop yields through being used to produce yield-boosting fertilizers and pesticides (chiefly among these, natural gas is used to synthesize ammonia and urea to provide artificial nitrogen to crops, which probably the biggest yield booster).

Not only that, but oil is essentual to lubricate and power farm machinery to sow, maintain and harvest crops, transport the food potentially hundreds of miles to the consumer and process the food. Hence, without fossil fuels, modern agriculture would not function and crop yields would plummet, likely only producing enough for around 2 billion people, hence 5 billion would be "surplus". This means that if our supplies of fossil fuels are ever threatened (and as they are nonrenewable this is inevitable, through peak oil or just from becoming to costly in energy terms to extract), humanity is screwed.

If you also consider the exploitation of other nonrenwable resources, the destruction of native habitat such as rainforest which is essentual to our survival and the rapidly rising list of species either extinct or on the brink of extinction, it quickly becomes clear that we are living beyond our means, as through overpopulation, we are unsustainably taxing the Earth.

With that said, climate change is simply a sympton of a much larger problem that is our own excesive numbers and if we don't deal with overpopulation soon, mother nature may just do it for us.

 
xerxes
Dec 08, 2011
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: larryt700 Show

Simply by quoting articles you show that you are too simple-minded and unintelligent to do anything for yourself. That's quite a good crutch you've got there, LarryT

 
+ Add Argument

5
No


larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
1 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: ezpzbutton Show

A ton of science??? Where??? YOU ARE AN ABSOLUTE MORON! There is NO global warming! There is no climate change caused by man! There is only the facade created by a bunch of money hungry environmentalists who want to create fear in order to make freakin money and you turd balls are catering to it!

If the IPCC were REAL then they would report that Gore's hockey stick graph has been disproven.... Then they would let you know that the past ten years was actually a cooling trend... Face it! You are a lemming following the rest of the idiots into obvlivion.... Now IF, and I mean IF man creates any changes which I think is pretty freakin bold of us considering how big the Earth is and how small we are, then that impact would be less than 1/2 of 1% of an impact, which cannot even be proven to that miniscule amount... Then we would be pouring billions into changing 1/2 of 1% of preventing climate change????

BE REAL!!! This planet has gone through at least THREE ice ages without out existence at all. It is pretty far fetched to give us so much credit to think that we can prevent nature from being nature. One single volcano puts out ten times in one day what we could in an entire year.... FREAKIN MORON!!!!

 
larryt700
Jul 23, 2010
1 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: starxx101 Show

That ENTIRE ARTICLE IS ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT!!!!! NASA refers to the IPCC scammers and IPCC refers to NASA....

It is ironic that the shuttle program is being shuttled.... If you are too dumb to see it yourself then YOU ARE AN IDIOT!!! But I will play...

What happens when a bunch of scientists are suddenly out of a job????

You got it batman... They find another JOB!!!!!!!! So NASA jumped on the global warming bandwagon.... ROTFLMAO GO FIGURE!!!!



 
larryt700
Jul 24, 2010
1 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: starxx101 Show

Oh yeah??? What is different?

 
larryt700
Jul 24, 2010
1 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: lilaboty Show

Grim reality????

What is that grim reality? Lemme see? Earthquakes, hmmm... Hurricanes...... hmmmm Fires??? Flooding??? hmmmmm Anything new happening that hasn't happened for CENTURIES????? Uhmmmm...

NOPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quit being an idiot!

 
larryt700
Jul 25, 2010
1 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: starxx101 Show

You are a child! You have no experience, no knowledge and very likely no education. To stoop to my level would actually take years for you to ascend to my level; so please don't patronize me with your pathetic nonsense.

 
larryt700
Jul 30, 2010
1 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: mikeyv113 Show

OK Dumbass! I am going to use YOUR own GLOBAL WARMING SCAMMERS' website to PROVE MY POINT...

Take a look at this website.... And yes, it is one of your own idiot global warming cultist.... uhm... I mean alarmist...

Here is the site....

Take a deep breath and figer it out.... No, you are too brain dead and brain washed to figer it out there Einstein....

http://www.effectofglobalwarming.com/predictions-of-climate-change.html

Now go look down by the picter.... Yes, that's picture to most of us but to you idiots it is picter that shows a graphic of heat arrows and the globe... Do you notice anything odd????

Yes, there were large amounts of CO2 found in ice cores within the Antarctic...

SEE IDIOT, IT WAS SO HOT THAT THE LARGE AMOUNTS OF CO2 GETS TRAPPED IN ICE??? If it were so hot, then dumbass, HOW IN THE WORLD DID IT ICE OVER?????????????????


I hear crickets again......

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: mikeyv113 Show

The global warming scam is just that... A SCAM! Cap and trade is an environmental scheme to make money off of taxpayers and does absolutely NOTHING to stem global warming or whatever environmental scam is perpetuated by the environmental nazis.

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: starxx101 Show

Yes it is! When you have to manufacture a fake hockey stick and choose between land temperatures and sea temperatures in order to find the more 'convincing' temperatures to back your side, then that qualifies as a scam.... Sorry, the scientists themselves passed thousands of emails where they pick and chose data that supported their cause... Not much of a debate there.... I guess science went up for sale when Gore promised billions for research... I guess I can't blame them... If I were a research scientist, I too would rather drive a mercedes instead of a toyota.

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: mikeyv113 Show

Dude, don't be an idiot! Trap radiation??? Those same gases would prevent those same damn rays from getting here from the sun in the first place... Please stop being stupid? Seriously

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: ezpzbutton Show

Make sure you HIDE THE DECLINE MORON!!!

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: ezpzbutton Show

The hottest year in the past 12 has been in 1998... BUT GLOBAL WARMING SCAM ARTISTS ARE HIDING THE DECLINE!!!!

YOU ARE BEING SCAMMED!!!!!

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/globalwarming.html

http://earthpro.info/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350746/posts

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/07/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history

http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/05/global-warming-scam-to-cost-americans-trillions/

http://www.nerepublican.com/index.php/2009/10/10/global-warming-scam/

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: starxx101 Show

GIVE ME A BREAK!!!! ARE YOU SERIOUS????

That was another scam!

CFC is another scam that we paid billions for and then... Guess what???

Scientists realized that THOSE BAD gases were TOO FREAKIN HEAVY to reach the ozone layer!!! LOOK IT UP BEFORE YOU AMATEURS COME AT ME WITH MORE BULLSHIT!!!!

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: starxx101 Show

IDIOT, there are more scientists against global warming than those few who are trying to make billions off of it....

LOOK THAT UP TOO!!!

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
How about reading the Washington Times...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/mar/06/20070306-122226-6282r/

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Obviously there are some blind followers that believe this bullsh*t... That is why politicians get away with what they get away with, because the idiots in this country and there are FAR more idiots than sane and reasonable people, tend to believe everything that they hear and have falled for this global warming scam, hook, line and sinker. I have studied this supposed phenomenon since the eighties and I have made real scientists look stupid. One scientist claimed beyond reason that it was the gases, it was the gases... I took a thermometer and in the sun it was 92 degrees.... When I went in the shade, it dropped to 86 degrees... I said the SUN warms us, not GAS.... He didn't respond. I told another scientist that if CO2 is the culprit, then we need to change millions and millions of fire extinguishers that have CO2 used to COOL fires... Then I asked scientists at the Natural History Museum in Los Angeles to take a container of atmospheric gas, just under pressure of ten pounds and take a vessel of CO2 at ten pounds in another container and see which one cools faster....

Now, I ask you, which one cooled faster???? You guessed it, it was the CO2..... DAMN it sucks to be stupid don't it! The CO2 in fact cooled two degrees faster than the atmosphere which PROVES Al Gores theory totally wrong and that CO2 follows warming and cooling trends but does not CAUSE IT!!!

Anyone else wants to play amateur scientist????

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Hey. let's pick another gas! How about methane???? Wanna have a scientific experiment over that one? It is funny that we have gone through an industrial revolution, major wars and the pollution of the seventies, yet the sea has risen ZERO feet and ZERO inches... The same polar ice caps have melted, replenished, melted and replenished over and over again and then those poor polar bears who the indians are pissed off at because they are SO OVERPOPULATED that they are eating all of the fish....

BTW why are the polar bears numbers increasing with all of this GLOBAL FREAKIN WARMING????

OH, that was another man-made SCAM!!!!

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=1ea8233f-14da-4a44-b839-b71a9e5df868

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Any other global warming cult followers out there?????

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
I am hearing crickets.... WHERE ARE THE GLOBAL WARMING CULTISTS??? I am starting to hear an echo...

 
larryt700
Jul 22, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Another thing.... What do plants feed off of? Yeah, CO2... So if we leave it up to idiots to get rid of all of the CO2, what would we have left? You got it! A freakin Desert! So keep it up scam artists, you are single handedly costing taxpayers millions while destroying the planet!!! You go!!!

 
larryt700
Jul 23, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: mikeyv113 Show

Congratulations on your A.... When reading those text books, did they reveal that about 100,000 years ago the CO2 levels were more than double of what they are today, yet the Earth's climate was 20 degrees cooler??? Ah bit u dednt figer dat wun out deed yuh?

 
larryt700
Jul 23, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: mikeyv113 Show

ROTFLMAO College environmental what????

OH THAT QUALIFIES YOU LMAO

 
larryt700
Jul 23, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: starxx101 Show

You are an idiot! That's the plain fact! You are one of those spoon fed liberals who thinks throwing billions of dollars into something THINKING that it would do a damn thing!

 
emperorofone
Jul 23, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
It has been proven that the poles, and many other forms of life emit large amounts of Methane gases, with are heavy contributors to Global Warming, mankind only contributes to the base of global warming.

 
larryt700
Jul 24, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Ingles/Crista.html

 
larryt700
Jul 24, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Do you idiots remember the global cooling scare of the seventies????

http://yowusa.com/earth/2007/earth-0307-11a/3.shtml

http://www.123helpme.com/preview.asp?id=80603

http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/beck/230899.htm

http://www.sepp.org/key%20issues/ozone/ozonscare.html

 
larryt700
Jul 27, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
Rebuttal to: starxx101 Show

You are brainwashed! You are an educated IDIOT! You drank the Kool-Aid!

 
octavionecole
Aug 04, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
I don't exactly know where to go with this but I must say The MAJORITY or it is.

 
againstthecurrents
Oct 12, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
It is so sad that climate change has been politicized.

I try to be understanding of both political perspectives, but on this one I just don't get it.
I don't understand why one side denies evidence, for what other end than to create a wedge
to demonize the opponent?

This isn't just about climate change, this is about the future.

Which ever country is home to the creation of non-oil based sustainable energy will have the equivilent to the nuclear bomb in the economic future.

Why are people in America using labels from the 1960's in political debates instead of embracing the idea that clean energy is better, no matter what, and IS the future,

so we should be all over this like NASA was the moon!

 
lilmisstuborn
Oct 17, 2010
0 convinced
Rebuttal
No...we just speed it up it was gonna happen but we just toatly made it 1million times worse

 


Use these tags to find similiar debates

animals biology Cancer children climate change cool creation Creationism Darwin evolution Frankie fun gay genetic genetics Global Warming god Government health innovation life mars medicine Physics Politics religion research science society space technology theory universe warming